Survey on Blockchain Benchmarks
Author:
Affiliation:

Clc Number:

TP311

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    In recent years, blockchain technology has undergone rapid development and found widespread application in areas such as data circulation, finance, logistics, government affairs, and judiciary. Alongside this growth, various benchmarks have emerged to evaluate the performance of different blockchain systems. However, these benchmarks exhibit significant differences in scope and methodology, lacking a unified framework to standardize their design and evaluation processes. In addition, there is no consistent metric system to explicitly define the performance and security capabilities required of blockchain systems. Drawing from the development history of databases, a unified, repeatable, and fair benchmarking standard can provide valuable guidance for industry advancement. As a specialized form of distributed database management system, blockchain can benefit from the extensive experience gained through the evolution of database technology. Inspired by database benchmarks and considering the unique characteristics of blockchain systems such as decentralization, immutability, and trustworthiness, a blockchain benchmarking reference framework, UFBCB, has been proposed. This framework identifies five core elements essential to blockchain benchmarks: application model, data model, workload, metrics, and execution rules, and clarifies the interrelationship among these elements. It provides a unified standard for evaluating blockchain performance. Moreover, a comprehensive metric system encompassing performance, energy efficiency, scalability, and security is introduced, aiming to capture the critical capabilities of blockchain systems comprehensively. Based on this framework, a detailed comparative analysis of existing blockchain benchmarks is conducted, highlighting common issues and deficiencies. Finally, this study discusses potential directions for the future development of blockchain benchmarking.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

张孝,秦春玲,王文收,刘昊,陈晋川,杜小勇.区块链测试基准综述.软件学报,2025,36(7):3151-3183

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:June 18,2024
  • Revised:September 17,2024
  • Adopted:
  • Online: April 25,2025
  • Published:
You are the firstVisitors
Copyright: Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing ICP No. 05046678-4
Address:4# South Fourth Street, Zhong Guan Cun, Beijing 100190,Postal Code:100190
Phone:010-62562563 Fax:010-62562533 Email:jos@iscas.ac.cn
Technical Support:Beijing Qinyun Technology Development Co., Ltd.

Beijing Public Network Security No. 11040202500063